Uncategorized

3 Things To Consider Before Inviting Your Friend To See Left Behind

Written by Steve on September 16, 2014

3 Things To Consider Before Inviting Your Friend To See Left Behind

LeftBehind_poster_webIn a couple weeks time the Left Behind movie will open in cinemas around the world.  As someone who got “onboard” the Left Behind evangelistic bandwagon 14 years ago when the original version with Kirk Cameron came out (yes I rented out the big screen at a clubhouse and invited many unsaved friends hoping that by watching it they may become “saved”) can I offer 3 things to consider before getting evangelistically excited about the new Left Behind?

Take it as the voice of experience…

 

Left Behind Theology is Bad Theology

News Flash: The Rapture – Tribulation – Anti-Christ theology of the Left Behind series is only about 200 years old!

Theologians are still pondering how the musings and theories of 19th century Plymouth Brethren minister John Darby became the eschatological underpinning of millions of evangelical and charismatic Christians.

But it did…

I was one of them.

Darby’s theology ( later propagated through Biblical translations like Scofield’s Reference Bible)  fostered an escapist attitude among the church that focused the Bride’s attention on escaping the earth rather than renewing it.

Fast forward 200 years to when many Christians increasingly cast themselves in the role of persecuted victim, a theology where Jesus comes back and proclaims we were “right” after all and proceeds to kill everyone else has a certain attractiveness.

The problem is (to paraphrase Brian Zahnd) Jesus is not like that.  Jesus has never been like that.  There has never been a time when Jesus was remotely like that.  Many Christians don’t realize that…but they should.

Summed up, Left Behind theology is bad theology for a number of reasons but chief among them is that it just makes Jesus look bad.

And I don’t care much for that…

 

People won’t get saved watching Left Behind

I was perusing the Left Behind facebook page and one thread had over 30,000 comments talking a lot about the movie being used as a tool for salvation.

Comments such as:

* Can’t wait to see this movie! Hope this movie brings the unsaved to Christ so they don’t get left behind.

* I pray that many get out to see this, to realize what is ahead of they aren’t ready for the coming of Christ.

*  I can’t wait. I am dragging my husband (agnostic) to this so he can SEE what he will be facing someday..

I appreciate the sentiments (hey, I was there once) but seeing a movie doesn’t “save” anyone.  And when fear is used as the tool, that’s about as far away from the salvation Jesus brings as you can get.

And that’s what Left Behind sells.  It sells fear!  As if Jesus can’t woo his bride to himself through unconditional love, he instead has to put a shotgun to people’s head and threaten them with all sorts of catastrophe if they don’t “accept” him.

I’m not saying books, film, and art can’t be used to help reveal who Jesus is to people…

…I’m just saying the Left Behind film doesn’t reveal who Jesus is.

 

Left Behind is about money

Christians are simply being marketed as a group and used to make a number of people a LOT of money.  As a film lover myself I have no issue spending my hard earned cash at the cinema or for a download on iTunes knowing that while I am purchasing a couple hours of entertainment and storytelling some producers and actors are raking it in.

But…

* no one is trying to convince me to bring my friend to see Iron Man 3 because their eternal salvation is at stake.

* no one is trying to sell me a ministry resource kit so I can do a church small group study on Guardians of the Galaxy

* no one is urging me to see the latest disaster movie because it’s all in the Bible and going to come true one day

EVENT-KIT

No, movie producers know that there is a huge market now for Christians who will not only pay to watch movies where they are cast as the persecuted victim who is finally vindicated  (God is Not Dead) but movies where they can be convinced that it is their moral duty to bring as many friends as possible.

The sound you hear is Jesus turning over tables in the market place… 

To sum up

My transition from evangelistic promoter of Left Behind in 2000 to vocal critic in 2014 doesn’t come from deep theological discussions or eschatological arguments.

Not in the slightest…

It’s because I see who Jesus is just a little clearer now than I did then.

I see now that the prince of peace really is The Prince of Peace

Why do I feel so strongly about Left Behind?

Because Jesus deserves so much better…

7 comments

  • TommyG

    September 16, 2014

    Love your posts and hold no brief for fear films, Christian or otherwise, but as far as belief in “the rapture” starting only with Darby -that is patently untrue, and a bogeyman that has been hauled out time & again often by the very people who would take issue with grace preaching. You’ll find as much fear among those who don’t believe in “left behind” as those who do. The point regarding the rapture is that we are looking for the glorious appearing of Jesus, our Lover and Bridegroom, and not for “the wrath to come”, to which we were not appointed. And belief in “the rapture” goes far back to early church history (see Joseph Prince “The Rapture Explained – Part 2” excerpt on youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27wzVPQCmvs&list=UUJRSBsjLPipnu8y03qa2_Iw )

    • Steve

      September 16, 2014

      Thanks Tommy! I am in full agreement in a 1 Thess 4:16-17 resurrection when Christ comes again. The problem with ” the rapture” is that the word suggests the church being taken away. The great promise is not that we are going but that He is coming… and we are transformed in the process

  • Replacement theology – not the movie, but the article.

  • I am going to do what I can to make sure a lot of people read this. I love it when people start to see Jesus a little clearer…. Keep up the good work.

  • Ben

    September 17, 2014

    Good article, though you and I don’t completely agree. Regardless of one’s view of the Rapture, what are we to make of the Jesus of Revelation 19 & 20 in order to see Him clearly and fully?

    • Steve

      September 17, 2014

      Thanks Ben! Here is my humble take on your question. As far as seeing Christ, its difficult to see him clearly in Rev 19 & 20 with the heavy use of metaphor and Jewish apocalyptic writing. Where we do see Jesus pretty clearly is in the 4 gospels. In fact Jesus says you actually get to see God clearly in him. So I think what we don’t see clearly in Rev 19 & 20 has to be seen through the filter of the Christ we see in Matt., Mark, Luke, and John. I don’t see the nature of Jesus changing…

  • John B. Carpenter

    September 24, 2014

    Yes, you’re right that Left Behind is bad theology. But so is Brian Zahnd. Indeed, the heresies that Zahnd teach go right to the heart of the gospel. I hope you know that.

    “Left Behind” distracts people from the gospel with trivialities and fiction. But Zahnd attacks the heart of the gospel with false teachings about God, taking only those portions of scripture that suit his liberal, self-serving portrayal of God, a “god” made in Zahnd’s own image.

    For more on Zahnd, see: http://www.aomin.org/aoblog/index.php/2014/09/18/hrc-promotes-hatredwalid-shoebats-roman-canon-argumentzahndian-jesus/

Comments are closed.

Related

© 2024 Beyond The Pale. Giza Theme by Pixel Object

Top