McCain & Obama: The VP analysis
After weeks of debate and discussion about who were going to be the presidential nominee’s picks for Vice-President, the answer is in. Surprisingly, both Republican and Democrat chose running mates from small electoral states (3 votes apiece). This goes against the conventional wisdom that says your running mate should be from states able to deliver crucial electoral votes, particularly in swing states. Neither Alaska (Palin) or Delaware (Biden) are going to do that.
Instead, each VP pick completely balanced out the resume (and glaring weaknesses) of the top of the ticket.
Obama: By choosing Biden, Obama chooses the experience cred he so desperately lacks. Biden is a seasoned veteran with more than 30 years in the Senate. He has chaired the powerful Judiciary Committee and Foreign Relations Committee and is highly respected by senate members on both sides of the aisle. He also balances Obama’s “liberal” moniker by being a Democrat with more centrist tendencies. The downside is that a liberal nominee choosing a running mate from the blue state heartland of the New England coast has not been particularly successful for the Dems in the past.
McCain: Completes his own balancing act by choosing Alaska governor Sarah Palin. As Democratic pundit Paul Begala notes, “Alaska has more reindeer than people” so adding Palin to the ticket was not to deliver the “Alaska” vote.
Instead, Palin brings conservative credentials to a ticket that was not winning over that demographic. She has been recognized as being a tough talking, anti-corruption proponent that has proved to be an effective governor. More importantly though she brings a breath of fresh air to a party that is often perceived as full of old, stodgy, white men (of whom McCain could be the poster boy). She is young and attractive, and more importantly…a woman. With thousands of Hillary voters still seething at the upset of their candidate by Obama, there just might be enough of a “lady vote” to deliver the election to McCain. The downside is that the recently announced pregnancy of her 17 year old daughter may make a mockery of her conservative cred and create enough media fodder to sideline her.
3 comments
Comments are closed.
Related
-
China / Hong Kong / Politics / Social Commentary / Steve's Life
Steve’s Letter to the Editor
By Steve -
Politics
Bush 43 is the worst president of the last 50 years??
By Steve -
Americana / Christianity / G.O.P. / Politics
Time for a Separation of Church & GOP
By Steve -
Christianity / Politics
More on Rick Warren’s Invocation
By Steve -
G.O.P. / Politics
Chris Christie: Please…Please run for President!!
By Steve -
Christianity / G.O.P. / Politics / Social Commentary
My thoughts on Mark Sanford
By Steve -
Americana / Christianity / G.O.P. / Politics
The Kingdom of God vs. The American Republic
By Steve -
Obama / Politics
Mr. President-Elect
By Steve -
God's Kingdom / Podcast / Politics / Social Commentary / Trump
Episode 090: Postcards from Babylon with Brian Zahnd
By Steve -
Politics
This Test MUST be wrong!!
By Steve
i don’t think hillary voters will vote for miss sarah from alaska just because she is a woman. they could not be more different women! the VP choices have made for interesting conversation over the past week.
I agree Shauna. Most Hillary voters will hold their nose and vote for Obama (just as a lot of conservatives will hold their nose and vote for McCain). But some women (and men) will see getting a woman to break the presidential glass ceiling a priority. This race will be SO close that it could be a factor. Not THE factor mind you, just A factor.
Thanks for stopping by Shauna, I think I’m going to enjoy this 🙂
Oh, I should also add Shauna that I suspect there are many Hillary supporters that would be none to disappointed at an Obama loss. Hillary would be the main contender then in 2012 against a very old McCain who may very well not seek a second term.
Hillary is a smart, shrewd lady. Despite here vocal support for Obama, I think she will be quite happy in her heart if he loses.