Mitt Romney’s Profile in Courage

In 1956 the book Profiles in Courage was published. It highlighted the stories of eight U.S. Senators who at some point in their career deified the opinions of their own political party in order to act with integrity on a volatile issue. Their actions however were often met with severe criticism, accusation, and loss of popularity within their own constituency.

Doing the right thing is almost never popular!

That’s why Mitt Romney’s decision to be the lone Republican voice of integrity last week during the Trump impeachment trial is a textbook Profile in Courage. He may never be president but Romney earned the distinction of being the first senator to ever vote to remove a sitting president of his own party from office.

As a long time Republican myself I can attest that the Party rather frowns on that. He’s been called a “traitor”, threatened with expulsion from the Party, and a move to have him recalled as a senator from Utah is underway.

But Mitt Romney is a smart man and although I believe he acted out of genuine belief and conviction, I know he is also a student of history; and he is well aware history will not look kind on the present G.O.P. leadership. Romney’s action in the impeachment trial was a signal to historians in the decades to follow essentially saying, “Don’t lump me in with those guys”

One only has to look at the execution of Jesus of Nazareth as a classic example that history does have a way of separating the wheat from the chaff.

The Gospel of John notes:

Later, Joseph of Arimathea asked Pilate for the body of Jesus. Now Joseph was a disciple of Jesus, but secretly because he feared the Jewish leaders. With Pilate’s permission, he came and took the body away. 39 He was accompanied by Nicodemus, the man who earlier had visited Jesus at night. Nicodemus brought a mixture of myrrh and aloes, about seventy-five pounds. Taking Jesus’ body, the two of them wrapped it, with the spices, in strips of linen.

John 19: 38-40

Joseph and Nicodemus. Two guys who John notes, because of their leadership positions, had to keep their admiration for Jesus on the down low. However, when push came to shove, they very publicly made their vote known on an extremely polarising issue. When given a choice between Barabbas, who advocated violent resistance to Rome (AKA Make Israel Great Again) or Jesus, who advocated for the non-violent path ushering in the Kingdom of God, these two men defied the chanting mob’s of their own constituency who were calling for the crucifixion of Jesus.

This decision was certainly not in their best interest. There was no resurrected Christ at this point. Both Nicodemus and Joseph were simply burying another dead “would be Messiah”. Yet there was something about this Jewish rabbi that resonated with their very being. Something about his message of love, mercy, and forgiveness not just for Israel, but as a Way forward for the entire world.

Those two men must have met with heaps of scorn and ridicule from their own party. But today, while the term Phrarisee has become a negative pejorative, history looks back at Joseph of Arimathea and Nicodemus and says, “well, but not those two.”

Profiles in Courage are almost never seen immediately

History will no doubt look on the present Republican leadership’s condoning of “an appalling abuse of public trust”in a negative light but with the addendum, “Well, except for Mitt Romney”

2 comments

  • Sherry

    This is so good. Thank you! I’m sharing this…

    • Steve

      Thanks Sherry!

Comments are closed.

Related